Upholding Democracy through Constitutional Courts: A Comparative Study of Indonesia and Germany

Andrey V. Kotyazhov; Habibi Habibi

doi:10.5281/zenodo.21306463

Abstract

Constitutional courts play an essential role in safeguarding democracy, maintaining constitutional supremacy, and protecting fundamental rights within modern legal systems. This study aims to analyze and compare the roles of the Constitutional Court of Indonesia (Mahkamah Konstitusi) and the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany (Bundesverfassungsgericht) in upholding democratic governance and constitutional order. Using a normative-juridical and comparative constitutional law approach, this research examines constitutional provisions, statutory regulations, landmark judicial decisions, and recent scholarly literature related to constitutional adjudication and judicial independence. The findings reveal that both courts function as guardians of democracy through judicial review and constitutional interpretation; however, significant differences exist regarding institutional independence, enforcement mechanisms, judicial authority, and public trust. Germany’s constitutional model demonstrates stronger institutional stability, abstract constitutional review, and higher legal compliance, whereas Indonesia’s Constitutional Court continues to face challenges associated with political influence, democratic consolidation, and inconsistent implementation of constitutional decisions. The originality of this study lies in its integration of comparative constitutional analysis with contemporary discussions on democratic resilience and judicial legitimacy in transitional democracies. Nevertheless, this research is limited to doctrinal and comparative legal analysis and does not incorporate empirical interviews or quantitative institutional data. The study concludes that strengthening judicial independence, enhancing constitutional enforcement, and improving public trust are essential to reinforce democratic governance in Indonesia. This research contributes to the broader discourse on comparative constitutional law and the evolving role of constitutional courts in contemporary democracies.

Keywords:

Constitutional Court; Democracy; Judicial Review; Comparative Constitutional Law; Indonesia; Germany

How to Cite

. (2025). Upholding Democracy through Constitutional Courts: A Comparative Study of Indonesia and Germany. Justitia Nova: Indonesian Journal of Modern Law, 1(1), 16-31.

Cara Mengutip

Upholding Democracy through Constitutional Courts: A Comparative Study of Indonesia and Germany. (2025). Justitia Nova: Indonesian Journal of Modern Law, 1(1), 16-31. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21306463

Unduh Sitasi

Copyright

Copyright Notice

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process.

Privacy Statement

The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.

References

Akah, A. U., Edino, O. F., Agbor, U. I., Nwagboso, C. I., Musa, A., Adams, J. A., Ebegbulem, J., Eja, T. R., Bassey, U. S., Ogar, J. I., Nwagboso, S. N., & Ekpo, S. O. (2024). Elections Administration and Bimodal Voter Accreditation System (BVAS) Technology: International Journal of Public Administration in the Digital Age, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.4018/IJPADA.352042
Alashry, M. S. (2025). Examining the Impact of Government Censorship on Freedom of Information Law in the Middle East: A Comparative Analysis of Egypt, Jordan, Tunisia, and Libya. In D. Baker & L. Ellis (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Libraries, Librarianship, and Information Science (First Edition) (pp. 182–192). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-95689-5.00182-6
Al-Dulaimi, A. O. M. (2025). The jurisprudential debate about the jurisdiction of the Federal Supreme Court in Iraq. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 12, 102008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.102008
Alghafri, B., & Tubaishat, A. (2025). Balancing Privacy and Security: A Comparative Analysis of AI-Driven Surveillance in the UAE and USA. The 16th International Conference on Ambient Systems, Networks and Technologies Networks (ANT)/ the 8th International Conference on Emerging Data and Industry 4.0 (EDI40), 257, 142–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2025.03.021
Altamirano Rayo, G., Mosinger, E. S., & Thaler, K. M. (2024). Statebuilding and indigenous rights implementation: Political incentives, social movement pressure, and autonomy policy in Central America. World Development, 175, 106468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106468
Alvarado-Vélez, J. A., Silva-Conde, D. I., Medina-Garcés, G. Y., & Mejía-Chávez, V. (2024). Justice for rural women: An exploratory analysis of institutions and mechanisms to access justice in Chimborazo, Ecuador. Heliyon, 10(6), e28234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28234
Ayambire, R. A., Pittman, J., Azunre, G. A., Musah, C. I., Agominab, R., Abdulai, A.-S. J., Amponsah, O., & Takyi, S. A. (2025). Pathways to just conservation: A crisp-set qualitative comparative analysis of environmental defender mobilization in conservation conflicts. Global Environmental Change, 93, 103030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2025.103030
Borgesano, F., De Maio, A., Laghi, P., & Musmanno, R. (2025). Artificial intelligence and justice: A systematic literature review and future research perspectives on Justice 5.0. European Journal of Innovation Management, 28(11), 349–385. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-01-2025-0117
Brown, S. (2025). The denial machine: How institutions perform legitimacy while failingthe people. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 19(4), 839–855. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-07-2025-0218
Büyükokutan, B., Keskintürk, T., & Arıcıoğlu, H. S. (2025). The Turkish knowledge trap: Populist resentment as elite-counterelite collaboration. Poetics, 112, 102040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2025.102040
Dahal, G. (2024). Nepal’s experience in implementing the federal government system: Assessment of law-making by the local governments of Kaski district, Nepal. Heliyon, 10(4), e26250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26250
Essien, E., & Jesse, E. E. (2025). Urban governance and political influence in contemporary urban settings of midsized cities in Nigeria. Urban Governance, 5(2), 169–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ugj.2025.05.003
Garoupa, N., & Spruk, R. (2025). Populist constitutional backsliding and judicial independence: Evidence from Türkiye. International Review of Law and Economics, 84, 106301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2025.106301
Gupta, A. K., Dhungana, H. P., & Lamsal, B. P. (2025). Political parties’ accountability to the public in Nepal: What factors affect it? Heliyon, 11(1), e41312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41312
He, M., & Chen, Y. (2025). Personal data protection in China: Progress, challenges and prospects in the age of big data and AI. Telecommunications Policy, 49(10), 103076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2025.103076
Helberger, N. (2024). FutureNewsCorp, or how the AI Act changed the future of news. Computer Law & Security Review, 52, 105915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105915
Hynek, N., Gavurova, B., & Kubak, M. (2025). Risks and benefits of artificial intelligence deepfakes: Systematic review and comparison of public attitudes in seven European Countries. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 10(5), 100782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2025.100782
Lee, D., & Min, S. (2021). Defective democracy and the political budget cycle. Journal of Comparative Economics, 49(4), 947–961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2021.04.009
Li, S.-C. (2025). Government Information. In D. Baker & L. Ellis (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Libraries, Librarianship, and Information Science (First Edition) (pp. 487–509). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-95689-5.00112-7
Lomas, E., & Shepherd, E. (2025). Governance and Freedom of Information. In D. Baker & L. Ellis (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Libraries, Librarianship, and Information Science (First Edition) (pp. 241–247). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-95689-5.00055-9
Maatsch, A. (2024). Parliamentary adjustment during a crisis: Interplay of digitalization and domestic context factors. Internet of Things, 27, 101316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2024.101316
Machado, D. (2024). The protection of vulnerable algorithmic groups through collective data protection in the onlife world: A Brazilian perspective. Computer Law & Security Review, 54, 106027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2024.106027
Mkhize, N. (2025). Plans without action? Politics and institutional challenges of anti-corruption reforms in the BRICS countries. Journal of Economic Criminology, 10, 100197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconc.2025.100197
Muhhina, K. (2024). ICT-based co-production and democracy: Enacting space, people, and authority in polycentric sites of governance in Estonia. Government Information Quarterly, 41(1), 101905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101905
Olujobi, O. J., & Ape, N. T. (2025). Reforming legal frameworks for combating gas flaring in Nigeria: A comparative legal analysis and sustainable solutions. Resources Policy, 109, 105721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2025.105721
Peck, J., Sparke, M., Anguelov, D., & Zhang, J. (2025). On the frontier of party-state capitalism: Mapping the geopolitical economies of China’s Greater Bay Area. Geoforum, 164, 104302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104302
Regilme, S. S., & Parthenay, K. (2024). COVID-19 pandemic and competitive authoritarian regimes: Human rights and democracy in the Philippines and Nicaragua. Political Geography, 115, 103212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2024.103212
Renteln, A. D. (2022). Human Rights. In L. R. Kurtz (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Violence, Peace, & Conflict (Third Edition) (pp. 276–298). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-820195-4.00227-2
Rodríguez, F. (2024). How clientelism works: Evidence from the Barinas special election. World Development, 184, 106734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2024.106734
Smith, A. J., Theil, S., Weinberg, A., Bhugra, D., & Liebrenz, M. (2025). Mental health, medical incapacity, and political leadership in the United Kingdom: A multidisciplinary analysis of the intersections between psychiatry and constitutional law. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 101, 102109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2025.102109
Sovacool, B. K. (2022). Beyond science and policy: Typologizing and harnessing social movements for transformational social change. Energy Research & Social Science, 94, 102857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102857
Susanti, M. H., & Khu, S. (2025). The 2024 Indonesian presidential election in the accounts of millennials: A case study of Prabowo Subianto and Gibran Rakabuming Raka voters in Semarang, Central Java. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 11, 101629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101629
Tu, H., Yang, S., Dong, M., & Dai, P. (2025). Judicial Independence and Corporate Total Factor Productivity: Evidence from provincial court centralization. Economic Analysis and Policy, 87, 1946–1961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2025.07.020
Xiao, B. (2025). Agile and iterative governance: China’s regulatory response to AI. Computer Law & Security Review, 58, 106183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2025.106183
Xu, C. (2025). Autonomy, interrupted: Constitutional weakening of indigenous activism from civil war to civil society. World Development, 196, 107157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2025.107157
Yefet, B., & Friedberg, C. (2024). Gender quotas and media representation of female members of parliament under authoritarianism: The case of Egypt. Women’s Studies International Forum, 105, 102922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2024.102922
Zhan, C., & Qiao, S. (2024). Workload, legal doctrine, and judicial review in an authoritarian regime: A study of expropriation judgments in China. International Review of Law and Economics, 80, 106232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2024.106232

Justitia Nova: Indonesian Journal of Modern Law chevron_right